Skip to main content
DoerstepsSign in

Methodology

Why Doersteps is built around doing, together

People are not formed by what they consume alone; they are formed by what they practice, together. Most ministry tools help people consume. Doersteps moves people from consuming toward creating, and from alone toward together.

Three frameworks stack on each other here: a picture of where our hours go, a pattern for how somebody grows into leading, and an echo from campus ministry. They come from different places and say the same thing, and they rest on something older than any of them.

Where you are: consume and create

Two questions place any hour of the week. Am I consuming or creating? Am I alone or with others? The answers make four quadrants, and we keep their labels plain on purpose: the bluntness is the diagnosis.

Most of us spend most of our hours in the top two, and a lot of ministry, built with the best of intentions, keeps us there. Sunday isn't the problem. Stopping at Sunday is. Formation is movement down and to the right, toward creating together.

The consume and create quadrantA grid of four squares. Across the top, alone on the left and together on the right. Down the side, consume on the top row and create on the bottom row. The squares read consume alone, consume together, create alone and create together. An arrow runs from consume alone toward create together: the direction formation moves.ALONETOGETHERCONSUMECREATEConsumealoneConsumetogetherCreatealoneCreatetogether
The consume and create quadrant. The arrow is the direction formation moves.

What each looks like

  • Consume alone

    Watching a lesson. Reading Scripture on your own. A podcast.

  • Consume together

    Talking it over with a leader. A group Bible study.

  • Create alone

    A doerstep you own. Personal obedience. Starting a spiritual conversation.

  • Create together

    Leading a study. Serving. Discipling someone. A doerstep done in community.

The quadrants describe hours, not people. Doersteps never places a person in a quadrant, and never compares one person with another.

How you move: I do, you watch; you do, I watch

It is an old pattern for learning to lead: watch it done, do it while somebody watches, then be trusted with it. Doersteps builds that progression into the doerstep itself. Some steps are done alongside a leader. Some are your own, and belong to you. Some are done leading others. People practice leading before they are handed the title.

I do, you watch; you do, I watchThree stages from left to right. First, I do, you watch: a step taken alongside a leader. Then, you do, I watch: a step that is your own, confirmed by a person. Last, handed the title: leading others, after it has been practiced.I do,you watchalongside a leaderYou do,I watchyour own stepHandedthe titleleading others

The heart of it is the doerstep: a real action, confirmed by a real person.

What it echoes

If you know Chi Alpha, you will hear an echo of its three anchors: Real Devotional Life, Real Community and Real Responsibility. We do not map them one to one onto the quadrants. They are a resonance, not a formula.

The root

Doersteps is named for James 1:22: “be doers of the word, and not hearers only.” And Acts 2:42 describes the first church devoting itself to the apostles' teaching, to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer. Some of that is received and some of it is done; some happens alone and some together. The pattern is older than any framework on this page.

What research on learning finds

Two studies, both published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), say something about how people learn anything.

Freeman et al., 2014

A meta-analysis of 225 studies of courses in science, engineering and mathematics. Students taught by lecture alone were 1.5 times more likely to fail than students taught with active learning: about 34 percent against about 22 percent. Exam scores under active learning were about half a standard deviation higher.

Failure rates, lecture only against active learningIn the studies Freeman et al. brought together, about 34 percent of students taught by lecture only failed, against about 22 percent of students taught with active learning.Lecture onlyabout 34%Active learningabout 22%
Share of students who failed. Freeman et al., PNAS, 2014.

Deslauriers et al., 2019

In a Harvard physics course, students felt they learned more from lecture than from active learning, while measurably learning less. Feeling that you have learned and having learned are not the same thing. We call the gap the consumption illusion.

Both studies are about classrooms, not churches, and we use them for exactly that: evidence about how people learn. The claim about how people are formed in faith rests on Scripture, not on a journal.

Credit

The consume and create picture owes a debt to Ben James, “Aliveness and where to find it” (Substack, 2025), and to the Holy Post podcast, episode 729.

Sources

  1. Freeman et al. (2014). “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
  2. Deslauriers et al. (2019). “Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
  3. Ben James (2025). “Aliveness and where to find it.” Substack.
  4. The Holy Post podcast, episode 729.
Start freeSee who it works for